What occurs to inflation once we put a worth on carbon? – Financial institution Underground

Hannah Copeland, Lennart Brandt, Natalie Burr and Boromeus Wanengkirtyo

Emissions Buying and selling Schemes (ETSs) are an more and more standard market-based coverage to impose a worth on carbon emissions (beforehand costless to the emitter) (World Financial institution Group (2025), Division for Power Safety and Internet Zero (DESNZ) (2025)). With carbon costs anticipated to extend steadily, and sectoral protection broadening, these schemes have gained the eye of financial coverage makers (Breeden (2025), Mann (2023)). However what are the implications for inflation? By setting up a brand new device (a high-frequency recognized ‘instrument’) to measure the affect of provide shocks within the UK carbon market, we doc {that a} tighter carbon pricing regime quickly will increase power costs and inflation, and reduces output. We discover that this shock transmits via a number of energy-related commodity costs, together with oil and fuel, compounding cost-push pressures arising from the power sector.

In 2022, Europe skilled essentially the most dramatic power disaster of the previous few a long time. The UK annual inflation charge rose to a 40-year excessive of 11.1%, pushed largely by a collapse in pure fuel flows from Russia to Europe, which led to a surge in fuel and electrical energy costs (ONS (2022)).

A lesser-documented phenomenon, nonetheless, is that carbon costs additionally rose quickly over this era (Chart 1). From a central financial institution perspective, this raises an attention-grabbing query: may the carbon market have performed an under-acknowledged function within the 2022–23 rise and fall in power worth inflation? And in that case, does the character of an power worth shock matter from the angle of how financial coverage makers may need to reply? These are pertinent questions, because the UK carbon worth is anticipated to rise (inexperienced line), and UK ETS protection to develop, over the financial coverage horizon.

So as to add some context, in the summertime of 2022, the UK ETS carbon worth had doubled relative to the earlier yr (orange line). Together with the Carbon Worth Assist (CPS), the efficient worth of carbon confronted by UK energy turbines reached £115/tCo2e: a non-trivial price to electrical energy manufacturing (aqua line). Ember (2023), (2025) estimate that as electrical energy costs peaked, in August 2022, carbon accounted for roughly 13% of whole UK gas-fired and 45% of whole coal-fired era prices. Earlier than and after the power disaster interval, when gasoline costs have been decrease and extra steady, carbon emissions are estimated to have made up an excellent bigger share of general fuel era prices. In 2024, for instance, gas-fired turbines are estimated to have spent roughly £1 on carbon for each £2–£3 on gasoline. From March to August 2020, carbon prices are estimated to have been larger than their gasoline prices.

Chart 1: Carbon emissions allowance costs in the UK

Notes: The chart depicts the UK-relevant worth. The UK ETS was established on 1 January 2021, however UK operators have been sure to adjust to the European Union (EU) scheme till the top of April 2021, and 19 Might 2021 was the primary UKA buying and selling day (UK Authorities (2021), UK ETS Authority (2023)). The UK-relevant carbon worth is due to this fact the EU ETS worth (CFI2Zc1) transformed to GBP previous to 19 Might 2021 (purple line), and the UK ETS worth (UKAFMc1) from that time (orange line). The aqua line is the efficient carbon worth for the UK energy sector, ie, the ETS worth plus the CPS uplift. CPS charges are taken from HMRC (2024) Desk 3. The London Inventory Trade Group (LSEG) UKA forecast (inexperienced line) is in regular phrases (adjusted for two% inflation, and up to date on 28 March 2025). Future carbon values utilized by the UK Authorities for modelling functions equally see carbon costs rise over the approaching years (DESNZ (2024) Desk 1.

Sources: Financial institution calculations, Information from LSEG and HMRC.

The mannequin

To quantify the affect of a tightening of the carbon pricing regime on the UK macroeconomy, we estimate a vector autoregression mannequin utilizing Bayesian strategies (BVAR), partially recognized by our new UK-relevant carbon coverage shock collection (described under). Constructing on the methodology developed by Arias et al (2021), the proxy is launched as an exterior instrument. The BVAR is estimated in log-levels, utilizing month-to-month knowledge on the (UK-relevant) carbon worth, pure fuel and crude oil costs, in addition to actual GDP, power worth inflation and non-energy worth inflation. The pattern interval is June 2008 to April 2024, chosen to exclude the EU ETS pilot part (2005–07), the place allowances have been freely allotted and non-transferable to future phases, ensuing within the carbon worth dropping near zero.

The instrument

We lengthen the high-frequency recognized carbon coverage shock collection developed by Känzig (2023) from the EU to the UK carbon market, reflecting the truth that on 1 January 2021 the UK left the EU ETS and established its personal (DESNZ (2025)).

In sensible phrases, we gather a complete listing of (UK-relevant) regulatory replace occasions in regards to the provide of carbon allowances, masking the interval 2020–24. We then isolate the subset of these bulletins that aren’t ‘confounded’ by different information, and measure the change within the (UK-relevant) carbon futures worth in a good (at some point) window across the occasion. The important thing concept is that exogenous shifts in provide drive these worth fluctuations, that means that they can be utilized as an instrument to estimate the dynamic causal results of carbon worth actions. This method has a long-standing utility within the financial coverage literature (eg, Kuttner (2001), Gertler and Karadi (2015), Nakamura and Steinsson (2018)), and has extra not too long ago been utilized to power markets (eg, Känzig (2021), Känzig (2023), Alessandri and Gazzani (2025)).

Chart 2 exhibits the ensuing UK-relevant carbon coverage shock collection, aggregated to month-to-month frequency. To the most effective of our data, that is the one instrument in a position to examine the macroeconomic impacts of provide shocks within the UK carbon market. It’s due to this fact additionally the one instrument acceptable for estimating the affect of carbon pricing within the UK through the interval of most curiosity to financial coverage makers: the current power disaster and carbon worth surge.

Chart 2: UK-relevant CPS collection

Notes: The UK-relevant CPS collection, constructed as the share change within the UK-relevant carbon futures worth round regulatory coverage occasions regarding the provide of UK-relevant carbon emissions, aggregated to month-to-month frequency. ‘UK-relevant’ refers to EU ETS futures worth and occasions till 30 April 2021 (finish of UK operators’ compliance with the EU ETS), and UK ETS futures costs and occasions after 19 Might 2021 (the primary UK ETS public sale and buying and selling day) (UK Authorities (2021), UK ETS Authority (2023)). The 2005–19 portion of the collection (aqua line) is Känzig’s (2023) EU ETS CPS (variable: shock, pct). Word that every one our outcomes maintain on the choice model of the instrument, too (constructed because the change within the carbon futures worth relative to the wholesale electrical energy worth).

Supply: Authors’ calculations.

Outcomes

We discover that contractions within the provide of carbon allowances that enhance the carbon worth can have a major affect on the UK macroeconomy. They function very similar to different supply-side shocks: growing inflation, and reducing output, throughout the three-year financial coverage horizon. Chart 3 exhibits the impulse responses of UK macroeconomic variables to a restrictive carbon coverage shock, scaled to extend power worth inflation by 1 proportion level (pp) at peak. To offer a way of scale, this shock will increase carbon costs by roughly 7% at peak, and results in a protracted enhance in power worth inflation, which peaks after round one yr, adopted by a smaller however extra persistent rise in non-energy worth inflation (0.12pp at peak, an additional 4 months later), and a lagged and non permanent fall in GDP (-0.06% at peak, round two years after the preliminary shock).

Chart 3: Impulse response capabilities of UK macroeconomic variables to a restrictive carbon coverage shock

Notes: Impulse responses to the recognized UK-relevant carbon coverage shock, normalised to extend power CPI inflation by 1pp at peak. Estimation pattern: June 2008 to April 2024. The strong line represents the median draw. The shaded areas are the 80% credible intervals.

Supply: Authors’ calculations.

The dynamics indicate a transparent transmission channel, with the power sector taking part in a key function: passing on rising shock-induced prices to power costs, thereby propagating cost-push pressures to energy-intensive sectors throughout the financial system. However what drives these rising prices within the power sector?

Importantly, we discover {that a} tightening within the carbon pricing regime causes not solely carbon costs to rise, however oil and fuel costs, too. Chart 4 exhibits the impulse responses of various energy-related commodity costs to the restrictive carbon coverage shock. We observe a powerful, instant enhance in carbon costs (7% on affect), adopted by a smaller and extra gradual, however non-trivial, rise in oil and fuel costs (round 1.5% and 4% at peak, respectively). The rise within the crude oil worth is equally discovered by different papers (Känzig (2023), Barrutiabengoa et al (2025)), and could be rationalised by the truth that European and UK oil producers and refineries are coated by ETSs. Particularly, actions related to exploration and drilling, manufacturing and processing, transportation, and refining of oil are inside scope. The response of the pure fuel worth displays fuel-switching attributable to adjustments within the relative short-run marginal price of various kinds of electrical energy era, as substitution away from (extra carbon-intensive) coal into gas-fired era exerts upwards strain on fuel costs (Ember (2023)).

Chart 4: Impulse response capabilities of energy-related commodity costs to a restrictive carbon coverage shock

Notes: Impulse responses to the recognized UK-relevant carbon coverage shock, normalised to extend power CPI inflation by 1pp at peak. Estimation pattern: June 2008 to April 2024. The strong line represents the median draw. The shaded areas are the 80% credible intervals. The oil and fuel costs are the Brent crude oil and UK Nationwide Balancing Level (NBP) pure fuel entrance month futures costs.

Supply: Authors’ calculations.

In a mannequin extension, we evaluate the results carbon allowance, fuel, and oil provide shocks on the respective commodity worth. For a similar sized affect on power inflation, we discover differing results on headline inflation by sort of shock. Chart 5 compares the impulse responses of UK headline CPI inflation to a carbon allowance, fuel, and oil provide shock. We see that the kind of shock issues: if a 1pp at peak power worth leap originated as a provide shock within the carbon market, the headline inflation affect is roughly 25% greater relative to an equal shock arising within the fuel market, and a number of other months extra persistent than if it originated within the oil market.

Chart 5: Impulse response capabilities of UK headline inflation to shocks to carbon allowances, fuel, and oil provide scaled to extend power inflation by 1pp at peak

Notes: Impulse responses to the recognized UK-relevant carbon coverage shock, and the pure fuel and oil provide shocks recognized by Alessandri and Gazzani (2025), Känzig (2021). Responses are normalised to extend power CPI inflation by 1pp at peak. Estimation pattern: June 2008 to April 2024 for the carbon and oil shocks, and to December 2023 for fuel shock (owing to the shock collection size). Word: our UK-specific reconstruction of Alessandri and Gazzani’s fuel shocks (which takes the UK NBP pure fuel worth change round occasion days) allows estimation over the total pattern, and yields related outcomes. The strong line represents the median draw. The shaded areas are the 80% credible intervals. For comparability throughout shocks, these are standardised to extend power worth inflation by 1pp at peak.

Supply: Authors’ calculations.

Conclusion

On this submit, we’ve got estimated the causal results that adjustments in carbon costs have on mixture UK costs within the quick run. Word first that, in doing so, we’ve got solely actually thought-about the price aspect of local weather coverage. It’s well-documented that local weather insurance policies can indicate short-term trade-offs for economies which usually tend to present within the financial coverage horizon we concentrate on. Our mannequin doesn’t contemplate the macroeconomic impacts of a profitable transition to net-zero (which is past the financial coverage horizon). These may end in prevented financial losses and direct macroeconomic positive aspects that far outweigh the unfavourable short-term macroeconomic impacts of local weather insurance policies.

Second, carbon costs are set to rise additional, and we anticipate carbon coverage to develop into extra stringent and enhance in protection over time. Subsequently, it’s value highlighting that the outcomes offered right here solely estimate common dynamics over the baseline pattern interval (June 2008 to April 2024). Given the substantial developments within the UK power sector already over the previous decade – together with, however not restricted to, the phase-out of UK coal-fired electrical energy era – these relationships could possibly be time-varying: a dimension that we need to discover additional.

In any case, our outcomes underscore the significance of not treating fluctuations in power costs as homogenous. Whereas they’re all ‘supply-like’, how central banks reply to those shocks may differ relying on the kind of shock, even when the height leap in power costs is similar. We discover that essentially the most difficult implications for headline inflation (and thus financial coverage) come up from power worth jumps coming provide shocks within the carbon market. A shock of this nature transmits diffusely, growing not solely carbon but additionally oil and fuel costs, in a approach that compounds cost-push pressures arising from the power sector.

Hannah Copeland and Boromeus Wanengkirtyo work within the Financial institution’s Structural Economics Division, Lennart Brandt works within the Financial institution’s Exterior MPC Unit and Natalie Burr works within the Financial institution’s Exterior MPC Unit.

If you wish to get in contact, please e mail us at bankunderground@bankofengland.co.uk or depart a remark under.

Feedback will solely seem as soon as authorized by a moderator, and are solely revealed the place a full title is equipped. Financial institution Underground is a weblog for Financial institution of England workers to share views that problem – or assist – prevailing coverage orthodoxies. The views expressed listed here are these of the authors, and are usually not essentially these of the Financial institution of England, or its coverage committees.